|
One more in a string of compromises
Mon, Jun 8, 2009
|
| Posted by: Martin McGuirk |
|
When I first planned the double-deck long “Yantic-Willimantic” peninsula on my HO layout I concluded I needed to use a helix to move trains between the two levels. Somewhere along the line I figured if I had the mainline gradually climb as it ran the length of the peninsula (about 36 feet or so) I could gain enough elevation to eliminate one or more turns from the helix. But things started unravelling once I realized I had to (1) Leave some level track in the various switching areas – having sidings and spur tracks with grades can become an issue, so in general I wanted to keep these areas fairly level and (2) Once the railroad started climbing I was in danger of busting through the ground on the upper level before I wanted – in other words the separation between decks became too small.
One way to get around this, of course, is to spiral the layout as it climbs – essentially maintain the separation between decks as both decks increase in height. This works if you have a true mushroom layout, with a raised floor, or if the starting elevation is fairly low. In my case, the base track level is about 47” at “water level” – New London harbor. Add 15”-16” to that and you end up with the upper deck about 63”-64” – which is about chin-height or a little less for me. Having the upper deck fairly level at 63”, and having the lower deck climb to the entrance of the helix meant there was less and less visible “sky” on the lower level. It was also obvious there would be some issues accessing the lower deck tracks for operating and even viewing. The answer was to level off the lower deck tracks and add another turn or two to the helix.
Another example of how multi-deck layouts are really a long series of compromises. |
|
comments(5)
•
|
| |
Comments |
|
Posted by: jack@nyrs.com on Tue, Jun 16 2009
www.nyrs.com
Marty,
You should send me your PTC III and let me update the software in it. Jack |
|
Jack,
What does the update do? Do I need to send you the keypad or the other gizmo? (that's the technical name, you know!) You should come on the show and discuss it at some point. |
|
Posted by: jack@nyrs.com on Tue, Jun 16 2009
www.nyrs.com
The earlier versions had an intermittent memory loss problem with power outages and I fixed it in software. If your keypad doesn't have a wire soldered on back of it you should send it to me too. The software goes in the controller 'the other gizmo'
Thanks for the plugs in your book and the show. I would be happy to come on the show anytime. |
|
Jack,
The keypad has no wire on the back (that I can see). I can box them up and send them to you - where should I send them to? Marty |
|
Posted by: jack@nyrs.com on Wed, Jun 17 2009
www.nyrs.com
NYRS
13225 Thornton Dr Westlake, TX 76262 Send $10 for return shipping and I'll cover the rest. |
![]() |
| "As a long time model railroader, author and former MR Staff writer Marty McGuirk has inspired and helped thousand of fellow modelers realize their dream layouts." -=Ryan (Model Railcast Show) |